Having for weeks defended the socialist sexualization of children program from "Safe Schools Coalition," Federal Education Minister Simon Birmingham has finally come clean and admitted that the program does contain "a number of resources, lessons and content not necessarily appropriate for children."
He also admitted that the attempt to get children as young as 11 to "imagine" they are performing homosexual sex will be removed from the program, although the damage is done to some young people who are now at risk of committing suicide after trying such unnatural sex acts. "Some of the gender diversity role-playing activities, that have been the focus of public criticism, will also be removed."
He also has agreed to stop the program's blatant attempt to re-direct children to third-party homosexual sex shop, sex club, and pornography websites. "All third-party organisation branding will be removed from official resources." But again, much damage has already been done to young impressionable lives.
"Senator Birmingham declined to respond to criticism the program's material was highly ideological." Which may be because he is firmly on the side of the ideology which spawned the program, and which compelled him to defend it until the Prime Minister insist he make some changes to it.
"But (admitting that the material is actually highly ideological, Birmingham) said the government was making it clear sexual and gender diversity advocacy and activism should not be part of the program."
"Those who had done so had done the program an enormous disservice," he said.
"I would urge them to make sure that they respect the fact that it should be exclusively about the well-being of children in schools."
These admissions are sufficient to warrant the removal of the program completely, as parents, teachers and citizens can no longer have ANY confidence in any of the "Safe Schools Coalition" programs.
"Mr Birmingham said parents should have confidence in what is taught in a school and receive clear information, especially about potentially contentious issues."
"Parents should have a right to withdraw their child from classes dealing with such matters," he said.
Like a naughty school boy being caught doing something very bad, Mr. Birmingham, is cautiously admitting he has done something wrong, but does not seem yet prepared to take full responsibility and receive his punishment. Being the responsible adult in charge of the rollout of this program to 500 schools, he should now do the honorable thing and resign.
The children already harmed by this attempt to recruit young Australian children to the homosexual ideological cause will suffer potentially life-long emotional and possible physical trauma.
Who will they blame when they become adults and demand someone be held accountable for teaching them that these sex acts were good, colourful, healthy and worth trying? For encouraging them to allow sexual deviants to perpetrate these sick sex acts on them? For destroying relationships, spreading sexually transmitted diseases, damaging impressionable children rather than protecting them? Who?
Responsibility must start at the top Mr, Birmingham. It must also include staunch supporters such as Bill Shorten, Daniel Andrews, Penny Wong, Warren Entsch etc. They should have been protecting children not encouraging their conversion to something which puts their very lives at risk.
What happens in Australia if same-sex "marriage" succeeds in removing the traditional definition of true marriage from the law? There will be absolutely nothing standing in the way of programs such as this, and much worse than this, from being rolled out and imposed on all schools in Australia, both government and private.
If you refuse to teach these programs then, the law will come down heavy on you because you will not be allowed to say that any of this stuff is wrong. If the law teaches, endorses, legitimatizes and promotes homosexual sex and all the deviant variations, then we no longer have freedom to protect our children from such programs.
Where will same-sex "marriage" lead our once young and free society? Is this what our forefathers fought and died for?
Source AAP via The Age: http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/government-reveals-changes-to-controversial-safe-schools-program-20160318-gnlyhj.html
Every child comes from and needs BOTH a mother and a father. Same-sex "marriage" intentionally keeps either a mother or a father from the child. Government should protect the child through upholding traditional marriage.
There is “a time to be silent, and a time to speak”. (Ecclesiastes 3:7). Now is the time to speak, so please speak up and defend children, truth and freedom. Craig Manners
“What the world needs most is a voice that courageously speaks the truth, not when the world is right, but a voice that speaks the truth when the world is wrong.” Fulton Sheen
True marriage offers true equality for children. Every child comes from and needs BOTH a Mum and a Dad. Every human being has dignity and deserves respect. All sorts of relationships can be respected at law without having to change marriage laws. In fact that has been the case legally for many years. The simple fact remains though that not every relationship is marriage.