Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal (R) vetoed a bill that would have protected people with religious faith against same-sex couples coming after them for refusing affirm and be involved in what they consider immoral and socially damaging unions under the legal guise of "marriages."
Deal’s decision comes after the business community, Hollywood and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) organizations urged him to veto the legislation. The bill, HB 757, would have protected clergy, faith-based organizations and their employees from litigation for refusing to conduct a same-sex wedding or provide services “in the exercise of their rights to free exercise of religion under the Constitution of this state or of the United States.”
He vetoed the bill after several major corporations, including Walt Disney Co., the National Football League and Intel, made clear that it would impair their ability to do business in Georgia and vowed a boycott of Georgia if it passed.
Ryan T. Anderson, a senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, said the governor “caved to pressure from large corporations and special interests.” He also accused Hollywood of hypocrisy for forcing its values on other companies that also want to work according to their beliefs.
“The hypocrisy of Hollywood, the NFL and the big business lobby in this case is astounding,” Mr. Anderson said in a statement. “They want to freely operate in Georgia according to their values, but they don’t want small-business competitors to be free to do the same.”
Australian politicians are too scared to speak out against the homosexual juggernaut.
Australian citizens are too scared to speak out against the homosexual juggernaut.
The pro-homosexual mainstream media have fully deployed all their resources in an all out offensive against anyone who stands opposed to normalizing homosexual sex acts in our society.
They conduct opinion polls in known homosexual suburbs and then treat the rest of us with contempt by pretending that the results reflect the opinion of the majority of Australian people and therefore a plebiscite in not needed. They employ pro-gay accounting firm PwC to do rigged "independent" reports on the cost of a plebiscite.
Malcolm Turnbull is weak and is too scared of the pro-homosexual lobby and media to go against them. He has become a tool of the coup plotters. Choosing new parliamentary candidates and cabinet ministers who openly favour homosexual marriage and removing any who stand against it.
Citizens who can see the dangerous consequences of normalizing and advancing these risky sex practices in our society and promoting them as normal to our children, by changing marriage laws, are too scared to even speak to their friends or to even put their name to a petition defending traditional marriage and family.
It would seem that the totalitarian homosexual movement has already successfully conducted a political coup in Australia. They have conducted a campaign which locks out all opposition voices, has silenced the people, silenced opposition politicians, secured the Prime Ministership and are now cementing their hold over our government and society.
Showing how far this insidious political movement has already infiltrated Australia, it is becoming more and more common for local, state and federal government offices to show the rainbow symbols of the homosexual political movement on government buildings and in public areas.
A plebiscite, at which frightened citizens can freely have their say in the non-intimidating privacy of a polling booth, is the only way for the will of the people to be heard. But it would seem that the juggernaut will do whatever is in their power to prevent the people from having their say. The homosexual media are powerful and they will probably succeed in relegating the democratic ideal of the plebiscite to history's dustbin.
What comes next we will see, but marriage will not be the end of this totalitarian movement.
Christians stand to lose the most in our society by the rise of the same-sex movement in Australia and all the changes they are imposing on society. They oppose the homosexual movement and are being hated for doing so. The hatred being fermented by the same-sex mob will, if left unchecked, result in churches being burned and Christians being black-listed, discriminated against, imprisoned and potentially beaten or killed.
Why should we care about that? Why care about this minority group who oppose homosexual sex being imposed as now being the norm and all the implications this legal status will bring if same-sex marriage undermines the marriage laws? Well, for one, we owe a lot to the predominantly Christian influenced first intake of Australian immigrants who laid our nation's foundations. Secondly, because they too, like homosexuals, are human beings and they deserve to be treated with dignity and respect.
So what is all the fuss about? Why don't Christians carry rainbow flags and join the sexual revolution and encourage the spread of homosexual sex acts?
The following short YouTube video explains well the Christian view of homosexuality:
Criticising Safe Schools doesn't make you homophobic.
ABC's The Drum
By Kevin Donnelly
There are legitimate concerns over having the Safe Schools program in classrooms, and simply attacking those who question it isn't helping anyone, writes Kevin Donnelly.
In response to the Commonwealth Government's decision to hold an inquiry into the Safe Schools Coalition program, ALP Leader Bill Shorten labelled one of the program's main critics, Senator Cory Bernardi, a "homophobe".
Judging by the reaction to the proposed changes to the Safe Schools program one could be forgiven for believing that it is no longer available to schools. In fact, the opposite is the case as all schools will be able to access the program and its official website and in Victoria the state government has signalled the program could be mandatory for government secondary schools.
While it is the case that the Commonwealth Government has recommended that the Safe Schools Coalition website be restricted to only hosting officially approved material, thus denying access to third party LGBTQI organisations and materials, given the nature of the internet, there is nothing to stop schools, teachers, and students, for that matter, accessing what might be considered controversial that advocate a LGBTQI sexual and gender agenda.
Critics of the recent changes, like Lucy Nicholas, argue it is wrong to require parental approval before schools implement the program.
Ignored is the reality that parents are their children's first teachers and that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights argues that parents are primarily responsible for their children's moral education.
Article 18, point four of the Covenant states:
The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.
It only appears reasonable and fair that if parents are able to withdraw their children from religious instruction classes, on the grounds that they disagree with their children learning about religion, that parents are also able to opt out of the Safe Schools program.
This is especially the case given that some of the resources and materials associated with the Safe Schools Coalition program and website are controversial and most likely questionable given the age of the children involved.
The "The Gender Fairy" story where primary school children as young as four years old are told "only you know whether you are a boy or a girl. No one can tell you" provides one example.
Another example is the gQ Gender Questioning booklet that asserts that, "There are many genders beyond just 'male' and 'female'; gender can be fluid and limitless" and that Trans people can be "lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, straight or something else".
But according to research carried out by Anthony Smith and Paul Badcock from La Trobe University, out of the 10,173 men and 9,134 women interviewed, 97.4 per cent of men and 97.7 per cent of women identified as heterosexual.
A 2002 study by Monash University's Bob Birrell and Virginia Rapson also suggests that heterosexuality is the norm when concluding that same-sex couples only represent 0.47 of those Australians who are cohabitating.
The figure quoted by the Safe Schools Coalition booklet, Safe Schools Do Better, that approximately 16 per cent of students are LGBTI appears overstated.
No amount of LGBTQI gender theory can ever deny the fact that heterosexuality is the norm and that procreation is best served when women and men are involved.
Those critical of the Safe Schools program are condemned as "homophobic", "transphobic" and "heteronormative". Bill Shorten, leader of the Opposition, has gone as far as labelling those members of parliament critical of the program as "knuckle-dragging right-wing senators".
Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the ACU and he co-chaired the review of the Australian National Curriculum.
Abridged version of the full article available at: Source
The Australian newspaper reports this morning that Greens MP Adam Bandt is asking for public money so the socialist rainbow coalition (a group who have successfully and insidiously infiltrated all major political parties as well as the media and education departments) can fly rainbow flags on government schools buildings. In a show of confidence that they believe they have already been victorious in taking Australia they are preparing to officially claim Australia as their territory by flying their nationalist banners and flags.
As the people of the homosexual juggernaut increase their level of special protection in Australia anyone who is not LGBTIQW are now being singled out for attack. You are either one of them, a vocal advocate for them or you vill be discriminated against.
After having his staff terrorized and his office ransacked, trashed and vandalized by same-sex activists, Australian Senator Bernadi has made it very clear that we are in a battle for the survival of the Australia that our fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers fought and died for.
The Senator has confirmed what many Australians have feared for some time now, that the Marxist, Communist, Totalitarian left-wing ideologues have infiltrated (Hydra like) and captured our educational institutions, media, corporations such as PwC, ANZ, Qantas, political parties (Greens, ALP and now the Liberal Party under Turnbull) and our social mores (the customs and conventions embodying the fundamental values of a group or society).
What happened last week in the Senator's office is a wake up call to all Australians. Our way of life, our culture, our values, and our freedoms (speech, religion, conscience) are under imminent threat.
Same-sex "marriage" and the indoctrination of our children by left-wing educators under the guise of an anti-bullying program (Safe Schools) are just the frontline battles of a bigger war to secure control of Australia.
"Friends, it is strength we will need for the battle ahead.
Last week’s ransacking was the tip of the iceberg of what is to come as we challenge the leftist agenda of big government and decaying society.
As (we) find our) voice and raise it to decry the failure of modern politics to reflect (our) concerns, the established agenda will be increasingly challenged.
This is the agenda that has captured our educational institutions, sections of our media, our politics and our social mores.
It is an agenda that has spectacularly failed society through policies like multiculturalism, cultural relativism, political correctness, statism and cradle-to-grave welfare.
After a social experiment lasting decades, the full catastrophe is slowly being felt.
People feel less safe, we have a growing racial divide, our educational standards have declined, our politicians are less respected, our media less trusted, our families are failing and our government is on an unsustainable economic path.
These are the direct results of the so-called ‘progressive’ agenda that has been working insidiously within our governing structures for many, many years.
But the fight back has just begun. Last week brought a small but symbolic victory in respect to the Safe Schools Coalition program.
After weeks of having the self-declared Marxist program defended by successive education ministers and too many ill-informed politicians, some changes were announced.
I find it simply extraordinary how anyone could defend elements of a program that encourages teenage boys to use female change rooms, asks 11-year-olds to imagine themselves in a homosexual relationship with a 16-year-old and provides links to bondage clubs.
Amazingly, one former education minister (Christopher Pyne) defended his own inaction by stating he didn’t think he should apply his 48-year-old eyes to the welfare of our school children. Frankly, I thought that’s exactly what an education minister, parents and others in a position of responsibility were required to do.
It begs the question, if our ministers are not prepared to act in the interests of our next generation and protect them from harmful practices, why are they there in the first place?
Little wonder the level of disillusionment with politics and politicians is so high.
Fortunately, a majority of my colleagues disagreed and forced change on behalf of parents everywhere. We challenged the totalitarian left and won a small but significant battle.
Any intimidation or violence from the political left – the self-proclaimed ‘tolerant’ ones – will not silence me. Rest assured, I will never stop advocating for the interests of the silent majority.
We’ve just shown how facts, determination and courage can overcome the vitriol and abuse of the left in reshaping policy. Now is not the time to rest on our laurels; we need to redouble our efforts to build an even stronger movement.
To fight against the tyranny of political correctness and give a voice back to Australia’s forgotten people.
It’s what Sir Robert Menzies sought to do over 70 years ago in forming the Liberal Party. It’s time Australian Conservatives reclaimed Menzies’ vision.
The above is an abridged version of Senator Bernadi's speech. Full version can be found at: Source
In accordance with s 6(5) of the Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Act 2017, this communication was authorised by Craig Manners of Ngumbe, Malawi.
With another openly homosexual candidate, Tim Wilson, being given a safe Liberal seat, and one of the few supporters of traditional marriage in Cabinet, Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, losing her pre-selection spot to an opponent of traditional marriage, it looks like Malcolm Turnbull has completely stolen the Liberal Party from under the noses of its traditional support base. Many are now saying they can no longer vote for the Liberal Party under Malcolm Turnbull, so where do they turn?
The "openly gay candidate, Mr Wilson launched the controversial (gay sex training program) Safe Schools Coalition during his time as human rights commissioner,"(2) an openly homosexual sex promoting activist program in schools dressed up as an anti-bullying program..
"The program was rolled out to more than 500 schools across the country, but faced staunch criticism and was officially gutted on Friday, just hours before the Goldstein preselection vote took place." (2)
"Mr Wilson was described as "neither conservative or liberal", a "proud supporter of the Safe Schools Coalition" and was criticised for his "unrelenting campaign for gay rights issues." (2)
Education minister Simon Birmingham, his predecessor in the job, Christopher Pyne, and assistant education minister Scott Ryan all jumped to his defence.
Whatever the result of a plebiscite it would seem Australia is destined to have compulsory homosexual sex training programs in its schools teaching things like "anal play" to Australian school children.
Having for weeks defended the socialist sexualization of children program from "Safe Schools Coalition," Federal Education Minister Simon Birmingham has finally come clean and admitted that the program does contain "a number of resources, lessons and content not necessarily appropriate for children."
He also admitted that the attempt to get children as young as 11 to "imagine" they are performing homosexual sex will be removed from the program, although the damage is done to some young people who are now at risk of committing suicide after trying such unnatural sex acts. "Some of the gender diversity role-playing activities, that have been the focus of public criticism, will also be removed."
He also has agreed to stop the program's blatant attempt to re-direct children to third-party homosexual sex shop, sex club, and pornography websites. "All third-party organisation branding will be removed from official resources." But again, much damage has already been done to young impressionable lives.
"Senator Birmingham declined to respond to criticism the program's material was highly ideological." Which may be because he is firmly on the side of the ideology which spawned the program, and which compelled him to defend it until the Prime Minister insist he make some changes to it.
"But (admitting that the material is actually highly ideological, Birmingham) said the government was making it clear sexual and gender diversity advocacy and activism should not be part of the program."
"Those who had done so had done the program an enormous disservice," he said.
"I would urge them to make sure that they respect the fact that it should be exclusively about the well-being of children in schools."
These admissions are sufficient to warrant the removal of the program completely, as parents, teachers and citizens can no longer have ANY confidence in any of the "Safe Schools Coalition" programs.
"Mr Birmingham said parents should have confidence in what is taught in a school and receive clear information, especially about potentially contentious issues."
"Parents should have a right to withdraw their child from classes dealing with such matters," he said.
Like a naughty school boy being caught doing something very bad, Mr. Birmingham, is cautiously admitting he has done something wrong, but does not seem yet prepared to take full responsibility and receive his punishment. Being the responsible adult in charge of the rollout of this program to 500 schools, he should now do the honorable thing and resign.
The children already harmed by this attempt to recruit young Australian children to the homosexual ideological cause will suffer potentially life-long emotional and possible physical trauma.
Who will they blame when they become adults and demand someone be held accountable for teaching them that these sex acts were good, colourful, healthy and worth trying? For encouraging them to allow sexual deviants to perpetrate these sick sex acts on them? For destroying relationships, spreading sexually transmitted diseases, damaging impressionable children rather than protecting them? Who?
Responsibility must start at the top Mr, Birmingham. It must also include staunch supporters such as Bill Shorten, Daniel Andrews, Penny Wong, Warren Entsch etc. They should have been protecting children not encouraging their conversion to something which puts their very lives at risk.
What happens in Australia if same-sex "marriage" succeeds in removing the traditional definition of true marriage from the law? There will be absolutely nothing standing in the way of programs such as this, and much worse than this, from being rolled out and imposed on all schools in Australia, both government and private.
If you refuse to teach these programs then, the law will come down heavy on you because you will not be allowed to say that any of this stuff is wrong. If the law teaches, endorses, legitimatizes and promotes homosexual sex and all the deviant variations, then we no longer have freedom to protect our children from such programs.
Where will same-sex "marriage" lead our once young and free society? Is this what our forefathers fought and died for?
Source AAP via The Age: http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/government-reveals-changes-to-controversial-safe-schools-program-20160318-gnlyhj.html
Gay advancement program Safe Schools, cleverly disguised as an anti-bullying program, "will continue in Victoria even if it loses Federal Government funding, Premier Daniel Andrews has promised."
Having been found by Federal Education Minister Simon Birmingham to contain ideology promoting material, depraved same-sex sex techniques, homosexual brainwashing techniques, and third-party referrals to porn, sex clubs, fetish clubs, and sex shop websites, Mr. Andrews is vehemently standing side-by-side Safe Schools and promising to use taxpayer's funds to keep it going. 1
In spite of the risks and dangers to children posed by SSC, advocate of the Safe Schools Coalition (SSC) MP Mr James Merlino (pictured above with one of the founders of SSC, Marxist Roz Ward) insists it will become mandatory in all state schools by 2019."
One of the few men in Canberra defending our children MP "Mr Christensen has revealed that the Safe Schools program was partly founded by Dr Gary Dowsett, a "longtime advocate of intergenerational sex, otherwise known as paedophilia".
"But Mr Andrews said if the Federal Government did cut funding for the program, the State Government would make up for the shortfall in Victoria."
Referring mostly to the ingenious nature of the program's pro-homosexual, anti-freedom agenda, "He described the program, which was launched in Victoria in 2010 before it was rolled out nationally in 2014, as "brilliantly effective".
The sheer brilliance of this program is astounding. An anti-bullying program which can be funded with state money to promote the socialist, anti-family, pro-homosexual, pro-gender-confusion, big-government ideology. Bullying is hardly even mentioned, and the whole feel of the program is so blatantly pro-LGBITQ and anti-everyone else. It is perfect!
"We'll lock that funding in at a state level - because if it saves just one life, it's worth it," he said."
"Safe Schools is officially saved in Victoria, and it will have a place in our schools long after Cory Bernardi and the rest of his dinosaurs eventually disappear from the Senate."
"Safe Schools program has 251 member schools in Victoria - 162 of them are Government secondary colleges."
"Victorian Education Minister James Merlino told 774 ABC Melbourne the Government had made an election commitment to roll it out to all public high schools in the state because it "saved lives". " Afterall saving LGBTIQ lives is more of a priority to Andrew's, Merlino & Co than the lives being lost due to the messing with kids this un-safe program is responsible for.
"He labelled the campaign to axe the program by some Federal Government MPs as "homophobic" and said it had been devastating to LGBTI students." Mr. Merlino however refused to discuss the emotional and physical harm done to all the other children this program has encouraged to try unnatural sex acts and allow sexual deviants to have their homosexual way with because of the program. Their suicides are going unreported in the name of the juggernaut.
"But Federal Government MP Eric Abetz said he had heard from parents concerned that the program was not about anti-bullying but "pushing an agenda"."
"If we are talking about stamping out bullying, which is the basis on which this program attracted funding - I saw nothing in it that actually says that bullying is bad," he said.
"It is about promoting a particular of agenda, with references to websites which the overwhelming majority of mums and dads around Australia would find inappropriate."
A Tale of Two Options.
Two protests took place this past week. One was by a group of concerned citizens who led a peaceful rally to Victorian Education Minister James Merlino's office in Belgrave. It was peaceful, they presented a petition requesting the removal of the deceptively named "Safe Schools"1 sexualization program from over 500 schools. It was peaceful and civilized. The other was a protest by pro-homosexual activists at Senator Cory Bernadi's offices in Adelaide. It was crass, uncivilized and violent. Property was damaged and effaced. Citizens were terrorized.
A tale of two options for Australia at a crossroad.
One (above) is civilized, tells the truth, defends children, promotes morality, healthy living and a healthy view of sex, They debate and protest with civility, respect for opponents, respect for the law, and for property. They propose a way of living which produces respectful, law abiding, well balanced children.
The other (below) uses deceit to promote their ideology, using happy words and colouful images to promote their inherently depressing and dark political manifesto. They impose a way of living which is immoral, produces rebellious, confused, children. They promote a view of sex which causes the spread of diseases, causes mental health problems, and harms children.
On Friday morning (18th March 2016), a group of pro-same-sex protesters stormed the office of Australian Senator Cory Bernadi and completely ransacked, trashed, vandalized and wrote obscenities over walls. They threatened staff, intimidating frightened staff and nearby citizens.
A Channel 9 crew captured the protest, and the damage that ensued.
These are the choices facing Australians if these totalitarian thugs don't de-rail the plebiscite.
If parliament takes away the peoples vote in a plebiscite and the compromised and intimidated politicians vote to change marriage laws, these thugs will have won and we can expect more of this in Australia.
They will do whatever they can to cancel the plebiscite, because they know the Australian people will not be hoodwinked and intimidated by this authoritarian movement. Sign a petition demanding the people have the final say in a plebiscite.
1) The Safe Schools Coalition programs provide resources such as and teach children as young as 11yo things like: Gay and lesbian sex techniques; Boys wearing girls school dresses; Chest binding for girls to inhibit breast growth; Penis tucking; Sex toy links; LGBT networks; Fetish club links. (www.KidsRights.org,au).
"Another recent assault in the (homosexual) propaganda war, an excellent example of the contempt in which the SSM lobby holds the mainstream of the Australian population, is the outrageous claim made by the accountancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers that the plebiscite on same-sex marriage will cost $525 million dollars and that, therefore, it shouldn’t go ahead in a time of fiscal constraint. This absurd claim was duly broadcast by the ABC and the Fairfax media without even a hint of scepticism at the report’s ridiculous methodology and assumptions, including that voting (on a Saturday) can be costed at $17.29 per person per hour — a purportedly staggering $281 million cost to the economy.
To this is added an estimated $20 million to account for the cost of the “mental anguish” suffered by SSM enthusiasts because the issue is to be put to a democratic vote." (With no figure put on the damage done to children by being encouraged by PwC to try anal sex and to let sick and depraved adult gays do it to them after they learnt about in from Safe Schools).
"The blatant hypocrisy and opportunism of this tactic is obvious, as the LGBTI lobby wouldn’t hesitate for a moment to demand such a plebiscite (whatever the cost) if they thought they could win and impose same-sex marriage on Australia. The only reason they oppose it is because they are fearful that the lab rats may rebel if given a vote and reject the SSM makeover of the institutional foundation of civilization.
The operatives know it is much easier for them to manipulate and intimidate a bunch of cowardly politicians.
Consequently, they have connived with PwC (which prides itself as “Australia’s top LGBTI employer in 2015”) to concoct a report that justifies a scare campaign designed to create a sufficient groundswell of alleged “public opinion” to allow Malcolm Turnbull to renege on his promise to hold the plebiscite — a promise made to placate conservatives when he carried out his coup. In this manoeuvring he is being assisted by leading Victorian Liberal and former premier Jeff Kennett, who, as the Gay News Network enthuses, “has penned his support for same-sex marriage and the anti-bullying program Safe Schools in a lengthy opinion piece in the Herald Sun”. Naturally, Kennett (who cites the PwC report) ridicules the planned plebiscite as an “abject waste of public money”.
"The constant, ruthless and cynical assaults on the traditional institution of marriage and the concerted campaign by LGBTI activists to gain access to 11- and 12-year-old schoolchildren, allegedly to ‘prevent bullying’, must be brought to an end. Bullying is lamentable, but it can be dealt with in a common-sense fashion without institutionalizing an extremist sexual and political ideology.
In their relentless campaign to legitimize their lifestyle, same-sex marriage proponents and LGBTI activists and their supporters (especially including gutless politicians) are treating ordinary folk like lab rats. The overall strategy is obvious: mainstream Australians are to be prodded and poked and given no respite. Constant shocks are applied to make them run this way and that way through an endless maze of propaganda and misinformation until they’re all exhausted and driven up against the wall and forced to make the decisions the SSM and LGBTI lobbies demand.
The sexual deviants at "Safe Schools Coalition" (SSC) are desperately seeking a "continual supply of children to be carefully confused, groomed, and exploited by LGBTI operatives seeking converts." This is child sexual abuse on a grand scale which makes their previous infiltration of the Roman Catholic church look like just a practice run.
They are after our children at schools and child-care centres, and all the while "a compliant media led by the ABC and Fairfax pumps out an endless stream of invective directed at anyone who dares to object at this rampaging SSM and LGBTI social engineering."
The people of the homosexual juggernaut are "seeking to infiltrate the education system to promote radical social change."
Source: Merve Bendle at Quadrant
The terrorizing of staff, and trashing of Senator Bernadi's office, send a chilling message of what is to come if same-sex "marriage" succeeds in undermining marriage and family in Australia. Socialists/communists always seek to destroy family as family (like the church) competes with their utopian view of the State controlling everything. Don't let them succeed in Australia. Act now.
“It is ironic that the protestors say that they are against any forms of bullying yet they themselves are resorting to bullying and standover tactics.
“Same-sex political activists need to engage in civil dialogue rather than trying to perpetuate fear among those who have differing views to them.
“Intimidation and bully tactics have sadly become all too common amongst those pushing rainbow ideology.
“Calling people bigots or homophobes does not address the issues that are being raised and is designed to silence any opposing views.”
ACL staff have also been subject to threating phone calls, death threats and intimidation as a result of the work that has been done to expose what is contained in the Safe Schools program and security at national office has been beefed up.
In February, several ACL staff members were sent graphic and disturbing pornographic images. This included images which appear to contain children. ACL has reported this to Police, who are undertaking an inquiry.
"This (Safe Schools -SSCA) program claims to be an anti-bullying program, to make “schools safer and more inclusive”.1 However, it does not address the problems experienced by the vast majority of school children who are regularly bullied because of their body shape or size, school grades, race or ethnic background, religious beliefs or family income – as shown by a study of 105,000 students.2
The SSCA program focuses only on... providing support and celebrate “gender and sexual diversity”.4 Yet sexual orientation does not even rate among the top seven causes of bullying.5
The term homophobia literally means “an extreme, irrational fear of homosexuality” but it is used to abuse and intimidate anyone who believes, with good evidence, that homosexual conduct carries serious health and other risks. For good reasons, the style book of Associated Press has told journalists to stop using the term.6
In reality, the program is thinly disguised propaganda to normalise homosexual behaviour and cross dressing among students at an age when some may be confused about their identity.
By encouraging students to “come out” as gay, lesbian or transgender, the program exposes students to serious physical and psychological health risks. Encouraging confused boys to use girls’ toilets and change rooms (and vice versa) is inappropriate and could lead to problems with sexual harrassment.7
In Victoria, some high school students were told that they can find out if they are “gay” by “trying it”.8 In New South Wales,...students were pressured to support same-sex “marriage” by signing a mural, girls who wanted to uphold true marriage – as the union of a man and a woman – were abused and bullied.9
Puberty is an emotional time for many students who are still developing their sense of identity, and focusing attention on homosexuality is unhelpful at this time. Most teens who experience same-sex attraction become opposite-sex attracted in adulthood.10,11,12
They should not be falsely led to believe that their adolescent attractions are necessarily fixed and permanent. Students with current same-sex attractions should not be encouraged to embrace activity linked with serious health risks.13
All students deserve a safe school environment, but the Safe Schools Coalition program is not the way to achieve it. Emphasising homosexual bullying tells other bullied students that the reasons they are mocked or abused are not as important, deepening their sense of injustice and despair. School communities should foster courtesy and respect for all other students, not just some."
For reference material please visit the Source. www.fava.org.au
Endangered Childhood by Warwick Marsh
March 19, 2016
The headline said, “Toddlers to be taught about cross-dressing in a controversial sex-ed program”.
What really caught my attention was this nonsensical statement from Early Childhood Australia spokeswoman Claire McHugh. She said that the proposed sex-ed program would reduce domestic violence because ‘rigid views on gender’ were associated with violence and domestic violence.
Let me paraphrase that piece of Orwellian double-speak just in case you don’t get it. People who believe men are men and women are women are more violent than those who don’t.
The subtext is that if we could just get rid of maleness and embrace gender deconstruction, helping men to become more like women, the world would be a far better place! If we teach our kids in pre-school that there is no such thing as male or female and we totally deconstruct gender, all will be well! While we are at it, let’s teach our children that homosexuality is normal and bully anyone in the classroom or the wider community that disagrees with us.
Everyone knows that when you are right, everyone else must be wrong, and you need to bully your opponents out of existence to prove it. Oh, and just for the record, the way we will achieve the total deconstruction of gender is to redefine sex, maleness and femaleness by redefining marriage. Once we redefine marriage to include same sex marriage, we will have achieved the total deconstruction of gender and our victory is a forgone conclusion.
I hear you say, “Warwick, you have been eating too much spicy pizza!” Well instead of my words, let’s hear it from the proponents of this philosophy.
Proponent of gender deconstruction and radical feminist, Masha Gessen, says, “Gay marriage is a lie. Fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there. The institution of marriage is going to change and it should change, and again I don’t think it should exist.”
On Friday, the federal government released their response to the REVIEW of the so-called Safe Schools Coalition that has been done by Professor Bill Louden.
Although the federal government has made more changes to the Safe Schools Coalition program than the minimal ones proposed by Professor Louden, we are extremely disappointed with the proposed changes.
Of course, we would like the WHOLE program to be scrapped, as it is ideologically driven and promotes sexual and gender diversity.
As SSCA founder Roz Ward acknowledged, “Safe Schools Coalition is about supporting gender and sexual diversity. Not about celebrating diversity. Not about stopping bullying. About gender and sexual diversity.”
[Roz Ward, address at the launch of the national Safe Schools Coalition in 2014.]
Under the government’s proposals, the Safe Schools Coalition will continue, along with the current funding.
Most of the ‘Resources’ and much of the offensive material will remain, some in a different form after being ‘re-written’, and the ‘Resources’ will be placed on the Safe Schools Hub instead of on the Safe Schools Coalition website. But, as we noted last week, including this program on the Safe Schools Hub undermines the good work on ‘anti-bullying’ initiatives promoted by the National Safe Schools Framework and the Safe Schools Hub.
Ros Phillips asked, “Who will re-write the program?”
Ros Phillips, research officer for FamilyVoice Australia, has warmly welcomed Education Minister Birmingham’s admission that the controversial “Safe Schools” program is flawed, saying it is a victory for Australian parents.
But she says much will depend on who is chosen to fix the problem. “Will it be academics with the same ideology as the bullies who trashed Senator Bernardi’s office?”
FAVA Media Release
Some of the politicians who called for a parliamentary Inquiry and the suspension of funding, have said they are happy with the government’s response – George Christensen told the ABC, “We're gutting most of the bad content. We're not going to have students exposed to websites that take them off to adult shops or to groups that are running sex toy workshops for youth and that sort of thing.
Read more --->>>
That is what is coming if marriage is undermined. Just picture the types of movies you will be seeing on the shelves at Woolworths, Kmart and Coles, and the magazine covers everywhere, and the sex-ed programs at schools, kindergartens and child-care centres.
Traditional marriage will be made illegal if same-sex "marriage" is made legal. I say made illegal, because once homosexual "marriage" is law it will be discrimination to publicly say that marriage is between a man and a woman for the benefit of children. That definition of marriage will be outlawed, and if you say it you will be targeted, blacklisted, and brought before discrimination courts.
If same-sex "marriage" is made law, homosexual sex becomes state-endorsed. It will be taught graphically at schools as being good and normal. TV and film producers will have carte blanche to produce even more trash showing homosexual acts.
As an example picture the soft-porn movie "Fifty Shades of Grey" which is all over the shelves at shopping centres like Woolworths, Coles and Kmart. It is often down at children's eye level and basically promotes hard-core sexually deviant practices. It would have been banned not so long ago. Or picture a box-set of an HBO sitcom called "Girls" with a photo of four lesbians all over each other on the cover, a series which glorifies and promotes lesbian sex as being normal. This again is being prominently displayed at children's eye level at Kmart in Australia.
What happens if this sort of thing is suddenly legitimized and encouraged by changing the law? Obviously you will be seeing far worse on the shelves. There will quickly be homosexual versions of "Fifty Shades of Grey." Children's shows will suddenly be filled with homosexuals. More heroes of our past will soon be depicted in film as being homosexuals. Superman will be cast as a homosexual. Captain America will be cast as a homosexual. You get the picture.
There is much much more at stake from this attempt to undermine Australian families, traditions and culture than people realize. That is why we are seeing such an effort by the homosexual movement to rush through the law rather than let the people have their say at a plebiscite.
It does not matter how much a plebiscite costs, the people must be given the final say. What cost can we put on the blood our fathers, grandfathers, grandfathers spilt for the freedom we still enjoy?
The remarkable thing achieved by Malcolm Turnbull since taking the top job in his coup in 2015 is the speed with which he had relegated all his conservative opponents within the Liberal Party to the backbench, managed to remove a number of elected MPs who stood for family and traditional marriage and simultaneously appoint practicing homosexual men and pro-homosexual, anti-traditional marriage men and women to take their places. Tim Wilson is the latest to infiltrate the Liberal Party and continue the chameleon like transformation of the Liberal Party to appear no different from the Greens.
In fact the pact formed between the Greens and the Libs to secure the Senate "reforms" on Friday 18th March 2016, may well signal which direction Turnbull is taking the Libs. So Liberal voters will now need to decide who to vote for instead of the Libs, and Greens voters (equally upset with the cozying up to the Libs) will also have to decide where to cast the votes instead of with the Greens. Suddenly Donald Trump looks fantastic.
Not only are politicians in Australia too scared to speak out against the homosexual juggernaut, but the pro-juggernaut movement, having targeted their opponents and one by one taking them out, seem all powerful as they have their people take up al the positions of political power. They have Malcolm fully in their pocket as the rainbow coup continues pretty much unopposed. Those who do oppose them and who they cannot seem to dislodge, they send the hit squads to terrorize them and their staff and they trash their offices. Senator Cory Bernadi is one such champion of freedom who they are out to get. The thugs paid him a visit last week and trashed his office after terrorizing his staff.
What kind of Education Minister was Christopher Pyne that he let this sneak through? And what kind of Liberal leader will Malcolm Turnbull be now that this has been exposed?
The Safe Schools Coalition agenda taken up by about 500 schools in this country to promote understanding of gender and sexual diversity is a brilliant insight into the ideological campaigns now transforming cultural values in Australia through capture of institutions…
The Turnbull government’s lightning-fast review of the program was delivered to Education Minister Simon Birmingham’s department yesterday… It is guaranteed to become a test of Liberal Party values under Malcolm Turnbull. Tony Abbott, who did nothing about the program as PM, has called it “social engineering” and wants the funds scrapped....
The Safe Schools program ... is funded by the Victorian government, and an $8 million contribution made by the former ALP federal government continued during the Abbott-Turnbull era. The aim is to combat homophobic and transphobic bullying…
Most people know an anti-bullying program when they see it. But this is something else — a pervasive and radical ideological agenda…
A reading of the materials shows this ideology is relentless and explicit: gender is not a binary male-female stereotype but a process of self-expression and “how you feel inside” and “may change over time”. Gender should not be reduced to the question “is it a boy or a girl?” because “there are a whole range of human bodies that are somewhere between”.
The philosophy is that “it’s up to the individual to describe what gender identity fits them best"…
It is hard not to conclude there is a sinister aspect to the program… The deliberate purpose is to weaken or break down or question the settled view of gender that many young people and students possess…
Safe Schools program linked to 'paedophilia advocate'
A Federal Government MP has used parliamentary privilege to accuse the Safe Schools program of being linked to a "paedophilia advocate".
Liberal Nationals MP George Christensen said Professor Gary Dowsett from La Trobe University helped establish the anti-bullying campaign.
Mr Christensen, who has called for the Safe Schools program to be scrapped, quoted a report containing "controversial views" which he said was published by Professor Dowsett in 1982.
The Member for Dawson told Parliament Professor Dowsett was a "longtime advocate of intergenerational sex, otherwise known as paedophilia".
"He argued in that journal that paedophilia should be part of the gay movement, it must be legally recognised and depicts it as a wider sexual liberation.
"I think it would shock many parents to know that a paedophilia advocate was overseeing the organisation that came up with the Safe Schools program.
"Given the shocking information, it's imperative all federal funding for Safe Schools be suspended immediately, pending a full Parliament inquiry."
Mr Christensen and other members of the Coalition backbench have called for a parliamentary inquiry into the Safe Schools program, rejecting a Government-commissioned report as a "joke".
Please read through this news update from Saltshakers plus the latest regarding the Safe Schools disgrace. This is just for one week as at 11th March 2016. Australia is under extreme attack. Anyone who dares resist the homosexual juggernaut is run out of town by the mob, people are losing their jobs (Senator Bullock), leaders who support traditional marriage (Tony Abbott) are falsely accused in public and given no right of reply. Homosexual sex is being exalted and embraced by Australia’s Prime Minister (Malcolm Turnbull) as well as the Opposition leader (Bill Shorten). Teaching homosexual sex and lifestyles to school children (Safe Schools Deception), kindy children (ABCs Play School) and now to children in child-care centres (Early Childhood Australia) is being praised by Australian political leaders and their wives. False Christian leaders are trumpeting sin as being good.
1- Full SaltShakers report.
2- The latest news on the Safe Schools Coalition issue, see separate Update
The Australian newspaper reports that a rising suicide rate has prompted mental health experts to call for greater focus on prevention and new measures they hope will dramatically reduce the number of deaths. What is needed is the opposite of what is overwhelming our young people today.
Until the media's complicit, intentional and over the top campaign to normalize what is not normal in our society is reigned in, and healthy (physically and mentally) living is promoted in its place, the suicide rate is forecast to only increase and quite dramatically.
Marriage between a man and a woman is good for the man and the woman as well as any children they produce. Homosexual activity between two men is not good for anyone and normalizing this behavior to our nation's youth by changing marriage laws, thus encouraging more of this behavior, can only lead more young people toward drug abuse, sexually transmitted diseases, mental health problems and suicide.
Confusing our youth about gender and pretending that a girl can be a boy if she so chooses just confuses young people and will lead to mental illness, embarrassment, shame, despair, drug abuse and suicide.
"The Australian Bureau of Statistics yesterday confirmed the suicide rate had increased from 10.9 per 100,000 people in 2013 to 12 per 100,000 in 2014 — the highest rate in a decade. Almost eight people a day, 2160 males and 704 females over the year, killed themselves in 2014, with suicide the leading cause of avoidable death in Australia.
Helen Christensen, from the Black Dog Institute and the National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Suicide Prevention, said the data showed strategies were not as successful as they needed to be. “If we want to be really serious about saving lives, we need to understand why people become suicidal and identify how we can best tackle these issues before they reach crisis point,” she said."
The reach of the homosexual juggernaut extends into some churches which used to be Christian churches but are now under the control of men in robes who call themselves Christians but teach something quite different from the teachings of Christianity.
This is not new. We are still seeing the effects of the mass infiltration of the Roman Catholic church by large numbers of homosexual men. The stories just keep coming. The problem is not confined to the Catholics either. Any liberal church/priest, Catholic or Protestant, which competes with God for authority is suspect.
The reality is that a Christian cannot embrace homosexual sex acts as good and normal if they are true to the one who established the Christian church, Jesus Christ. The teachings of Christianity say that homosexual sex is "detestable," "unnatural" and "shameful" among many other things.
Pro-homosexual, non-Bible believing "priests" inside these churches will do whatever they can to get you to believe otherwise. They set themselves up as being above God. But you need to question their motives, especially if you are taking children to their services or children's programs.
They normally always have to begin their tenure by undermining the Bible: "Can you really trust the Bible?" they ask. It is a bit like Satan saying to Eve, "Did God really say..." You plant a seed of doubt and then you can make God's flock your own.
They may re-word Satan's question into a statement: "We recognise that science and contemporary scholarship need to inform how we read the bible."
So suddenly science and modern scholars are more trustworthy than God's word the Bible and the flock now needs to elevate their priest as being the only one who can really interpret which parts of the Bible might actually be from God and which parts the flock must now ignore.
Again this is an old trick, one which the Protestant Reformation dealt such a firm blow to by making God's word freely available to the flock in languages they could understand. They took the power out of the priests hands and gave it to the people. Priests in modern liberal church's are trying to take back that power from the people.
On one supposedly Christian church website, immediately following this attempt to elevate men above God, is a mention of "human sexuality" with a link on these words to a blatantly pro-homosexual activist website called: Changing Attitudes.
But why do they do this? Why is the "priest" at this church for instance trying to undermine God about this particular issue and promote homosexual sex acts as being good, healthy and normal to his flock - including the children there?
Homosexual sex acts are not natural, they are not wholesome, they are not promoted by God as being good for people but rather as being harmful. God calls them "detestable," "unnatural" and "shameful."
Use your common sense. Read about this for yourselves and decide who you would rather trust your spiritual and eternal destiny to, not to mention your children's spiritual, mental and physical well being: a God fearing Christian who believes what God says, or a man-centered practicing pro-homosexual who questions God's word so that he can justify sexually immoral behavior?
Would you trust your child going off on a church camp, or youth group, with practicing pro-homosexual camp leaders who openly celebrate and promote homosexual sex acts to children just by the fact that they are proudly and openly and pro-actively "gay"?
Leviticus 18:22 “‘Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable."
Romans 1:26-27 "shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."
Men in robes collecting their pay cheques under such false pretenses should be approached with care.
SSCA: Check out this inversion of the Parental Control system.
by Terri M. Kelleher
News Weekly, February 27, 2016
A particularly concerning aspect of the Safe Schools Coalition (SSCA) program is how it can lock parents out of being able to monitor what their children are accessing online.
Material that the SSCA program directs students to advises them how to cover their internet browsing history. A consequence is that parents may not know what web-sites their children are accessing. “Cover your Tracks”, an article on the website of an organisation called Minus18 to which students are directed by SSCA advises students on “handy tips for you on keeping stealthy while browsing online.”
SSCA resource “Standout” advises students to ask teachers why websites such as Minus18 and other GLBT web-sites are blocked at school. They are also advised to ask the reasons.
This is activism which will put pressure on schools to allow access to these websites. The SSCA resource specifically says that, for some students, their family monitors access to the internet at home. The implication is that this is a reason students can say they need the website unblocked at school! (Standout, page 18)
Encouraging children to deceive or go behind their parents’ backs drives a wedge between parents and children. And, if parents do not know what their children are accessing on the internet, it undermines their ability to keep their children from influences that are not in accord with their beliefs and values and/or which could cause them harm. It restricts parents’ ability to keep their children safe.
One Minus18 article describes for female students how to bind your chest. This is a dangerous practice that can be lethal. That article also lists, under “Useful Websites”, a few “wicked websites … as somewhere to start” including the website of a sex shop named “Tool Shed” which stocks sex toys and sadomasochistic items such as restraints, gags and whips as well as pornography.
The SSCA booklet OMG im queer directs students to numerous organisations that are either LGBT specific or involved in LGBT activism. It is highly likely that students may choose Facebook or other online communities as their preferred method of connecting with some of these organisations.
The SSCA resource Gender Questioning (on page 19) recommends to students The Seahorse Club Victoria with full contact details, web address, email and phone number. The Seahorse Club recommends the nightclub/fetish club Abode as a “TG friendly venue.” Abode is located at the same physical address as the sadomasochistic venue The Parlour Lounge,which features sex rooms (“intimate play areas”).
While being “locked out” of knowing what their children might be accessing online, parents, on the other hand, are “locked in” to their children being exposed to the SSCA program if their school is a member school of SSCA.
There is no way to “opt out” as SSCA is rolled out across the whole curriculum and across all subject areas. SSCA resource “Guide to Kick Starting Your Safe School”, Point 5 says: “Actively plan to include same sex attracted, intersex and gender diverse people, histories and events in your teaching area.
“Whatever the subject and your experience, there are always new ways you can better integrate diversity through case studies, texts, and other examples. Challenge gender stereotypes and heteronormativity in discussions inside or outside the classroom. All Of Us is our Health and Physical Education teaching resource mapped to the Australian Curriculum for Years 7 and 8. It utilises short videos and learning activities to introduce students to sexual diversity, gender diversity and intersex topics.”
So there is no specific class from which parents can withdraw their children. Further, in Victoria the Labor government policy is to expand the SSCA program into all state high schools by 2018. So parents won’t have a high school to choose, to avoid the SSCA program.
Victorian mother Cella White has already withdrawn her children from a state high school for this reason and sent them to a fee-paying non-government school, which is a heavy financial burden on the family. Another Victorian mother, who has five children, says she and her husband will have no choice of an SSCA-free state high school by the time their eldest child starts in a couple of years.
Again the financial burden on the family will be substantial.
What can parents do?
Parents can find out if their children’s school is a member of SSCA by searching “Member Schools” on the SSCA website. Except in Queensland where the names of the member schools are not given. Parents can then search their children’s school website to see what information, if any, the school provides on the program.
Parents can ask principals if their children’s school is a member and how the school is implementing the program and what information is given to students, what handouts/activities it uses with the students.
Education in Australia is supposed to be free, secular and compulsory. For parents who do not want their children exposed to the SSCA program, education, certainly in Victoria at least, will not be free.
They will have to pay fees to opt out of the state education system.
Education is not truly secular when any particular view on such a personal and fundamental issue as sexual identity and expression is imposed on parents even if it is opposed to their beliefs or values.
Secular should mean that no one set of beliefs is taught. And where the SSCA program is effectively compulsory that is small comfort for those parents who do not want it for their children.
 https://minus18.org.au/index.php/resources/sexuality-info/item/441-how-to-bind-your-chest , accessed 26/12/2015.
 http://www.toolshedtoys.com/ , accessed 6/1/2016.
 https://www.facebook.com/ABODE.Club/posts/10152900279058318 , accessed 6/1/2012.
 http://theparlourlounge.com.au/about/ , accessed 6/1/2012.
 http://www.bluafterglow.com/home.asp , accessed 7/2/2016.
It is of deep concern to parents that the Government is behaving like big brother and forcing contested, highly divisive, experimental rainbow ideology onto our children,
The founder of Safe Schools Coalition, Roz Ward, has a broad socialist agenda which has managed to infiltrate over 500 Australian schools and gain the support of Simon Birmingham, Daniel Andrews and other political leaders who will lead our society to extreme tragedy, as happened when these experiments were imposed on Soviet Russian society. As then the main victims now will be families and children.
Ward "became a member of the far-left Socialist Alternative organization, giving full expression to her Marxist-LGBTI ideology in her address last March to the 2015 Marxism Conference in Melbourne (her full sermon can be heard here).
As several commentators have observed, this speech puts the Safe Schools program into its ideological context as part of a far-left strategy to initiate a sexual revolution within Australian schools. It is therefore, “extraordinary that politicians have not examined the ideological context of the SSCA program”, given the immense sensitivity of the issues at stake.
As Geoffrey Hosking explains in A History of the Soviet Union (1985):
“In the 1920s the regime tried to weaken the family as a ‘bourgeois institution’ [by passing new laws according to which] any stable cohabitation … could be considered a family … Abortion was available on demand [and] a partner to a marriage could obtain a divorce simply by requesting it”.
The result was an astronomical increase in the number of broken homes and abortions (in 1934 in Moscow there were only 57,000 live births compared to 154,000 abortions), while large numbers of women died from botched procedures. Meanwhile, the number of orphans skyrocketed, and they roamed the streets, starving, dying of disease, and forming criminal gangs that attacked people and stormed apartment blocks.
Very quickly, this anti-family policy combined with the demographic catastrophes of the Great Terror and Great Famine to decimate the workforce and cripple Soviet society, forcing a policy reversal that leaves present-day Marxist-LGBTI fantasists high and dry. Suddenly, Soviet propaganda broadcasts declared that:
The state cannot exist without the family. Marriage has a positive value … So-called ‘free love’ is a bourgeois invention … Moreover, marriage receives its full value for the state only if there is progeny, and the consorts experience the highest happiness of parenthood.
The institution of marriage was once more promoted, divorce was made very difficult, abortions were prohibited, and there was no tolerance for LGBTI issues. Indeed, in the schools, the revolutionary cultural obsessions were dumped from the curriculum and the focus returned to teaching skills.
School uniforms were reintroduced and pigtails made compulsory for girls. Indeed, right throughout Soviet society there was a return to traditional values and educational topics and methods, as the regime realized that it could not survive if society disintegrated under the impact of dysfunctional Marxist theories.
Nevertheless, vast numbers of single mothers and fatherless children were produced, and this situation was greatly exacerbated when the Great Patriotic war with Germany wiped out much of an entire generation of young men. Women were particularly oppressed as they struggled as single mothers while also working full-time and living in often pitiful accommodation.
Ultimately, Soviet society never fully recovered (and hasn’t to this day) from what became a major demographic deficit caused by the communist policies presently advocated by the principle architect of the Safe Schools campaign. All of this happened because the Russian people became the tragic victims of the “engineers of the human soul”, as Stalin approvingly called the fanatical progressivist ideologues who imposed insane Marxist policies on the Soviet population.
Now Australia has its own Marxist-LGBTI engineers of the soul, like Ward and her comrades. Fanatically committed to promoting the sexual interests, values, and behaviours of a tiny minority, such apparatchiks look forward to nothing less that the transformation of society into an LGBTI playground populated by the children of heterosexual folk who choose to marry in the traditional fashion and procreate. In this brave new LGBTI world our new progressivist masters can reign supreme and run amok, promoted and generously funded by state largesse, and protected by draconian laws promulgated, to its eternal shame, by a Liberal government.
The above is from an excellent article on the political ideology behind Safe Schools and the Daniel Andrews government, and most Federal and State education departments in Australia.
Note to Parents: We are still free in Australia. We do not have to silently let these people lead our children to slaughter. Please act today, send a message to Safe Schools and its political promoters, protectors and supporters that they must: LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE.
There is “a time to be silent, and a time to speak”. (Ecclesiastes 3:7). Now is the time to speak, so please speak up and defend children, truth and freedom. Craig Manners
“What the world needs most is a voice that courageously speaks the truth, not when the world is right, but a voice that speaks the truth when the world is wrong.” Fulton Sheen
True marriage offers true equality for children. Every child comes from and needs BOTH a Mum and a Dad. Every human being has dignity and deserves respect. All sorts of relationships can be respected at law without having to change marriage laws. In fact that has been the case legally for many years. The simple fact remains though that not every relationship is marriage.